Skip to content Skip to navigation

U.S.-China Human Rights Dialogue Resumes: Foundation for Action?

May 14, 2010

Although it is too early to assess the progress made in the just-concluded U.S.-China Human Rights Dialogue, Human Rights in China (HRIC) is encouraged by Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner’s comments that a range of specific cases, including those of Liu Xiaobo (刘晓波) and Gao Zhisheng (高智晟), were raised with the Chinese delegation, and that difficult broader human rights issues, such as freedom of religion and expression and independence of the judiciary and the bar, were discussed in the context of an international human rights framework.

Describing the two-day meeting as respectful, frank, and constructive, and laying a foundation for regular, ongoing discussion and cooperation, Assistant Secretary Posner identified at least one concrete benchmark – a legal experts dialogue that will be conducted in the next few months.

“In light of recent legal developments in China, such as the revised Law on Guarding State Secrets,” said Sharon Hom, Executive Director of HRIC, “the potential agenda could include many issues upon which both sides will have clear differences and could benefit from constructive discussion.”

HRIC urges both the U.S. and Chinese governments, as the process goes forward, to draw upon the diverse expertise and experiences of civil society groups and other non-government participants to enrich the dialogue process.

 

For more information on civil society organizations, see:

 

For more information on lawyers and rights defenders, see:

For more information on Gao Zhisheng, see:


For more information on Liu Xiaobo, see:

 

For more information on state secrets, see:

 

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective